Redbrick Features

Official Blog of the Features section of Redbrick

Letters Received: ‘The protesting craze’

with 6 comments

Letters

Letters

Dear editor,

Coming home from a long Friday of lectures on a Marxist interpretation of yesterdays latest crisis in the Middle East, worrying about which protest I should attend this weekend (will X fit attractive female protester be there or not?!), I kicked off my recycled rubber slips and settled into my 100% Organic hammock and opened up the latest issue of Redbrick. I was half way through it (and my dairy-free sos roll) when I came across Fiona McCoss’ article, ‘The Protesting Craze’. I have to say, I was almost killed by my vegan treat in my righteous indignant eco-liberal fury! Ms. McCoss’ wildly-assuming, patronising, and contemptuous caricature of those participating in any form of political activity (beyond, presumably, the ballot box) is, to say the least, lacking in any factual or critical analysis of the recent upsurge in political activism in universities and wider society. On a practical level, it isn’t clear from the article how Ms. McCoss could have so accurately stereotyped or evaluated the conviction of those participating in recent campus demonstrations from her vantage point a tan ‘inaudible’ range from a loudhailer (and presumably anyone she could talk to); she certainly demonstrates no knowledge of the time dependent achievable demands and goals issued by many of the recent protests. Underlying the entire article seems to be a contempt for any form of political or moral expression; a basic confusion and frustration as to why anyone would interest themselves with the needs and desires of people they or she doesn’t know. I have concluded that this article is an extraordinary attempt at rationalising apathy, of the sort derided by the great and the good at last weeks ‘Convention on Modern Liberty’ for permitting us to sleep-walk into the panopticon of modern Britain. I’m afraid to say that Ms. McCoss’ may be in for several very frustrating and confusing years to come. I suspect that as we enter a serious economic downturn this protesting ‘craze’ might really take off and people will start hitting the streets once more to secure their ‘livelihoods’ and, possibly, their freedoms (whatever those hippy ideals mean?!). I would advise Ms. McCoss’ to get on board now, or get left behind.

Yours sincerely,

Ben Aylott, Theoretical Physics and Applied Mathematics IV

Dear Redbrick,

I write in response to the article entitled “The Protesting Craze”. The article portrays protests as some sort of fad or trend. Given that the protests referred to took place in response to the hundreds of civilian deaths in Gaza, I find this attempt to trivialise the issue extremely offensive. Our right to protest is something we should be celebrating rather than undermining, in numerous states this right does not exist, and yet the article has presented it as something absent of real political meaning. Did the author consider past reasons for political activism such as apartheid and universal suffrage? Were those who engaged in these struggles just part of a “craze”? The criticism of students involved in protests is highly irresponsible, why portray those who care about humanitarian issues as simply wanting to be ‘cool’? This will only fuel the anti-political climate on campus and discourage students from taking action on issues they care about. I think if the author had attempted to talk to the students involved they would find their claim to be simply untrue. Finally, when protesting concerning an issue felt passionately about, I do not think a single person will care if the author has been annoyed by their actions.

Lauren Baker

International Relations

I would like to thank you both for your letters, I think it is important to remember that comment is about pure opinion, so in the spirit of debate we will be inviting Fiona to write a response to your letters. Once published please feel free to comment and continue the discussion.

Written by Nick Petrie

March 4, 2009 at 11:08 am

Posted in Letters, Responses

Tagged with , , , , , ,

6 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Dear all who responded to my Comment article,

    First of all, may I just stress, that the article was just that; a personal comment. I did not purposely mean to offend, but I was aware that my views may be seen as somewhat contraversial. This should not mean, however, that I am unknowledgeable or ignorant of the facts. I, just as much as you, are allowed to have an adverse opinion. If you can express your political beliefs, I am allowed to express my beliefs.

    Ben, yes, I am a cynic and I like to sarcastically, mock issues in a lighthearted way that come up in the news, such as in this case. I did not mean to offend, nor draw any ‘contemptuous caricatures’ of protesters.

    You seem able to write a response in the same, witty ironic fashion as my ‘patronising’ article is written, so why not take mine with a pinch of salt as I did yours? You, too, are expressing your views in a sarcastic tone, so why can’t I?

    You also say that the article lacks any factual or critical analysis; however, that was not my job. I wrote a comment, expressing my personal view – the underlying point of ‘Comment’. The facts you will find on the News page.

    In my defense, I am neither ‘confused’ or ‘frustrated’, or ‘wildly assuming’. I have friends who like to protest and who own very strong political opinions, and whilst I do not agree with them, or their actions, I let them get on with it. Each to their own, as they say. So, may I point out that the ‘caricature’ I stereotyped was infact formed from people I know.

    Lauren, again, I stress that the article was not meant to be offensive, but merely expressive. I did not mean to discourge students from protesting, or their taking part in any meaningful political debate that they believe in – nor was I writing to to see who cared if I was annoyed or not. As I said to Ben, I did not delve into the historical, factual details of protests because a) I take a different stance and b) Comment is comment, not data analysis.

    Celebrate your right to protest if you want, I am not trying to take that right away from you, I am simply expressing my views on them. We all have the right to freedom of speech, do we not?

    I stand by everything that I wrote, readers have to bear in mind that I am one voice, expressing one opinion. Of course there are going to be some, such as yourselves who disagree with me, like there are for every article or debate, but in fact, I have had several people agreeing with my article and my views. I am not deliberately trying to encourge the ‘anti-political climate’ on campus, just writing a comment on the pro-political one.

    I do take on board and appreciate your comments and your views regarding my article, however, one must remember, I have the right to express my opinion, just as you have in expressing adverse ones.

    I think it will be a case of let us agree to disagree.

    Fiona McCoss

    Fiona McCoss

    March 4, 2009 at 1:48 pm

  2. Dear Redbrick,

    Words can’t begin to describe how outraged I was at reading the Fiona McCoss article. Students have always protested, it’s not an “infection spreading” or a new craze and if anything student activism has been declining. Those who protest are the ones who have the courage to stand up for the things they think should be changed, even though it might not make any difference, unlike most students who show such apathy these days. Labelling these people in such a stereotypical way “vegan, eco-friendly” or “over-excited hippy kids” is discriminative. Also I noticed how McCoss focused only on the Gaza protests but mentioned nothing about the tuition fees protest on campus which was organised by the Guild. The only point of this article was to wind people up. It wasn’t even relevant to anything else in the paper. May I ask what McCoss does with her time which is so worthwhile apart from criticising “so-called humanitarians” and does she have any suggestions as to what else could be done instead of protesting? If we didn’t protest, and if we were all like McCoss, we would live in a society where we put up with everything we don’t like and don’t challenge any of the rules or rulers. So I’m sorry if she or anyone else finds us annoying, but we’re not going anywhere, for I refuse to become oblivious to the worlds problems and not do what is in my power to try and fix them.

    Clare Jerome

    Philosophy and Political Science

    Clare Jerome

    March 4, 2009 at 2:37 pm

  3. Just to clarify.

    The comment was based on a news story that at the last minute got dropped for something more important. Unfortunately due to the constraints of being a weekly student paper we were unable to modify the comment section in time.

    Nick

    March 4, 2009 at 3:24 pm

  4. Dear Redbrick,

    In response to Miss McCoss’s article and later post,

    Freedom of Speech, opinions, thoughts and our voices are all central factors in what we today know as society, they are all rights we hold up proudly and closely defend. Though Fionna McCoss tries to remove herself from criticism and debate by explaining her stance as merely a comment I urge to look at these values and their importance and see that to comment is to debate, it is to involve yourself in the discussion.

    I find Miss McCoss’s opinion and description of student protesters extremely worrying and ignorant, how can she so quickly whitewash all student protesters as brainless idealists blindly following recent events just for a laugh? Does she not see how damaging this is for all student’s reputations and just reinforces the widly held assumption that students are lazy and apathetic.

    We are none of these things, students go through enormous social and financial up-heaval to pursue their academic interests, we dedicate our time and money to being involved in the world we live in, student protests are something we should be celebrating not condemming, those students deserve our respect and understanding, that their beliefs, opinions and emotions concerning the wider world were so strong they felt the need to show this in a physical way by protesting is fantastic, we are seeing students get invovled in the wider world around them in the attempt to improve it and the lives of others, for this i believe they should be praised not pitied.

    By making her comment Miss McCoss denies these people the right to be seen as intelligent adults, she assumes they are all fickle, experience junkies looking for their next kick, a stance which completely belittles the ideals and beliefs of these people and those all over the world who stood united in their desire for a better world.

    Peter Spencer

    Archaeology

    Peter Spencer

    March 4, 2009 at 8:15 pm

  5. I think the point Fiona was attempting to make by pointing out that this piece was comment is not that she doesn’t have a responsibility as far as debate is concerned, but rather that these opinion pieces are supposed to encourage debate rather than be neutral. By making these comments Fiona denies no one anything, those who disagree with her are as equally entitled to their alternate point of view as Fiona is to hers.

    With regards to apathy, it is not a student issue, rather it is a people issue. Considering less than 10% of the student body will vote in the Guild elections this week, it is understandable that students might be accused of not caring. The Guild has far more impact on our day to day than the government does, and we get three opportunities to vote (year by year) for the candidates and policies we want. It is a microcosm that has far more impact on our day to day.

    So even though we have intelligent and driven students at university, some students really do not engage with the world around them, but this is true of many types of people. The students that do not engage, do not fail to engage because they are students, but rather because they are not inclined to.

    Fiona has also pointed out that she has not made wild assumptions, but rather based her comments on own personal experience, which is all any of us can do.

    As far as challenging the status quo that students are lazy, well thats up to us, the non lazy students to make sure we are drawing more attention than the ones that are doing nothing, because if we are honest with ourselves, there are plenty of truly lazy people.

    Nick

    March 4, 2009 at 8:37 pm

  6. I don’t understand why Ms. McCoss’ feels she has to spend most of her response defending her right to freedom of speech or the sarcastic and mocking style and manner of her ‘Comment’; her right to say what she thinks in the way she wants to is not in question (not by me anyway). Neither do I understand why she has apologised in case she may have offended me;I don’t believe anyone has a right not to be offended (but maybe you think differently…unfortunately it is also no longer reflected completely in law). Incidentally, I thought my response was very much in the spirit of free debate and was motivated not by being offended or challenged on some personal level (although my poor attempt at satire appears to have been confused for sarcasm…looks like I have some work to do). I merely saw an opportunity to make a critique of a poorly formulated opinion which I disagreed with. In this way, I didn’t assert that her opinion *had* to be reasoned and/or have some factual basis (although I find the suggestion that ‘fact’ should be relegated to the news section somewhat disagreeable), but ones which do possess these qualities are more convincing and stronger opinions (‘Comments’) and challenging views lacking in both is probably the easiest and most effective form of critique (especially when your ‘opponent’ accepts this).So, I hope Ms. McCoss will forgive my laziness and childish point scoring in this matter, I just couldn’t help myself.

    Ben Aylott

    March 6, 2009 at 1:38 pm


Leave a comment